Dayashankar Soni v. Moolchand Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged Rent Control Tribunal accepting documents in a case captioned Order 8 Rule 1 CPC despite wrong provision citation. Court held misquotation causes no prejudice and dismissed writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 99 of 2022
- Dayashankar Soni S/o Kheduram Soni Aged About 62 Years Caste Soni, R/o Beside Bagga Restaurant, Jodhapur Ward Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
- Moolchand Jain S/o I. Dan Ji Jain, Aged About 80 Years R/o Sadar Bazar Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
| For Petitioner | : Shri Govind Prasad Dewangan, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent | : Shri Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether acceptance of an application with wrongly quoted CPC provisions causes prejudice justifying curial interference.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dayashankar Soni
- respondent
Moolchand Jain
Coram
Goutam Bhaduri
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP227/99/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court