The appellants sought permission to withdraw their family appeal (FAM No. 51 of 2017). The court granted the prayer, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, and disposed of the matter.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted, and the appeal was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FAM No. 51 of 2017
---- Appellants
Versus
| ----Respondents | |
|---|---|
| 16/02/2022 | Ms. Pragya Pandey, counsel for the appellants. Shri Ghanshyam Patel, G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal. |
| Prayer is allowed. | |
| Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. | |
| Sd/- Sd/- | |
| gouri | (Goutam Bhaduri) (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Judge |
Rathram S/o Shri Bihari Sahu
Rathbai S/o Shri Bihari Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
The Land Acquisition Officer, Bilaigarh District
Goutam Bhaduri
Sanjay S. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
