Appeal for want of prosecution was dismissed due to the appellant's non-appearance on two calls without any representation filed.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA(MAT) No. 33 of 2020
Rahul Nirmalkar S/o Hemlal Nirmalkar Aged About 24 Years R/o Aajad Chowk Ward No. 13, Mandirhasaud, Police Station Mandirhasaud, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
Smt. Geeta Chhatre D/o Kumaru Chhatre, Aged About 21 Years Ward No. 09, Shyamnagar, Jhalap, Police Station - Patewa, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ----Respondent
16/02/2022 None for the appellant. The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant. No one appears for the appellant even in the second call. In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the court but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge Judge
gouri
Rahul Nirmalkar
Smt. Geeta Chhatre
Sanjay S. Agrawal
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
