The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected five review petitions (REVP No. 78/82/89/91/96 of 2022) challenging orders in various writ petitions. The court rejected the petitions by relying on the view taken in REVP No.62/2022.
All five review petitions stand rejected in terms of the order passed on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
REVP No. 78 of 2022
Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), Block -D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandi, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Epfo Was Respondent No.1 In Writ Petition)
---- Petitioner
Versus
2. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Jadgdalpur, Through Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
REVP No. 82 of 2022
Central Board Of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), BlockD,scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)-492004 (Epfo Was Respondent No. 1 In W.P.(S) No. 2200/2022)
---- Petitioner
Versus
2. Zila Shakari General Bank, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Through Its Managing Director Now Chief Executive Officer, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 2 Was Respondent No. 2 In Wps No. 2200/2022)
---- Respondent
REVP No. 89 of 2022
Central Board Of Trustees, Employees Provdent Fund Organization Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), Block - D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492004.
---- Petitioner
Versus
2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Dairy Federation Through Its Managing Director, Urla, Post Bmy Charouda, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
REVP No. 91 of 2022
Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through - The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (Rpfc), Block - D, Scheme No. 32. Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 492004 (Epfo Was Respondent No. 1 In W.P.S. No. 2164/2022
---- Petitioner
Versus
2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Dairy Federation, Through Its Managing Director, Urla, Post-Bmy Charouda, District - Durg (Chhattisgarh) (Respondent No. 2 Was Respondent No. 2 In W.P.S. No. 2164/2022
---- Respondent
REVP No. 96 of 2022
Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, (Rpfc), Block-D, Schme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsayik Parisar, Pandri, Raipur, District
Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492004 (Epfo Was Respondent No. 1 In W.P.(S) No. 2166/2022), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
2. Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Dairy Federation, Through Its Managing Director, Urla, Post Bmy Charouda, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
| 01/07/2022 | Mr. Vinay Pandey, Advocate and Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Advocate for the respective petitioners. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Prafull N. Bharat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate and Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate for the respondent No.1. Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate for the respondent No. 2. The instant review petition have been filed seeking review of the orders dated 11.04.2022, 29.03.2022 & 31.03.2022 passed in WPS Nos. 2560/2022, 2200/2022, 2066/2022, 2164/2022 & 2166/2022 respectively. A review petition of identical nature came up before this Court on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022 (Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization v. R. S. Sharma & another). The grounds raised by the petitioner seeking review are all identical in nature. In view of the same, this Court is inclined to take the same view in the present review petitions as well. Accordingly, the present review petitions stand rejected in terms of the order passed on 12.05.2022 in REVP No.62/2022. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE |
Ved
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the five review petitions challenging earlier orders should be allowed given the existence of a precedent on identical grounds.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization v. R. S. Sharma & anotherFollowed¶39
REVP No.62/2022 (Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization v. R. S. Sharma & another)
Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization
Kunwar Singh Dewangan
Jivan Lal Sannad
V.K. Samuel
Ram Lal Sharma
Smt. Premila Naidu
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
