Disposed

Goutam Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Dec 2021WPS/6855/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed State of Chhattisgarh to consider the petitioner's representation for regularization as a daily wage employee within 90 days and to pass a reasoned order, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No. 1 to consider petitioner's representation for regularization within 90 days and pass a reasoned order.

Goutam Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6855 of 2021

¶3

Goutam Kumar S/o Ghamsu, Aged about 54 years, R/o
Village Bargada, Post Donkrabhata, Tahsil
Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

¶4

 ---Petitioner

¶5

 Versus

¶6

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

2. Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Chhuikhadan, Distt. Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

 ---Respondents

¶9

`For Petitioner`	`:-`	`Mr. Pramod Ramteke, Advocate`
`For State`	`:-`	`Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.`

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶11

Order on Board

¶12

13/12/2021

¶13

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

¶14

that petitioner has made representation for
regularization as daily wage employee to respondent
No. 1 which may be directed to be considered and
decided in accordance with law.

¶15

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

¶16

3. Be that as it may, respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and decide petitioner's representation strictly in accordance with law within 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶17

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s).

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge

¶20

Harneet

Goutam Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Goutam Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bramha Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tanmay Das Gupta and Ors. Vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Pramod Kumar Jangde Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Mukesh Nage Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gautam Prasad Nirala Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Divya Neomy Benjamin Vs State of Chhattisgarh