Disposed

Mukesh Nage v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Dec 2021WPS/6853/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relief regarding non-acceptance of his joining by the Chief Medical and Health Officer. Court granted liberty to submit representation; no merit-opinion expressed; petition disposed of without prejudice to petitioner's legal rights.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make representation before Respondent No. 4 within 10 days to file a reasoned order within three weeks.

Mukesh Nage Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6853 of 2021

¶3

Mukesh Nage S/o Babulal Nage, Aged about 36 years,
R/o Vijay Ward No. 2, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar
Chhattisgarh, presently working as Pharmacist in
the Office of Urban Primary Health Centre,
Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

¶4

 ---Petitioner

¶5

 Versus

¶6

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

2. Mission Director, National Health Mission, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

3. Collector Bastar, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

4. Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bastar, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

¶10

5. National Urban Programme Manager, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

 ---Respondents

¶12

`For Petitioner`	`:-`	`Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, Advocate`
`For State`	`:-`	`Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Dy. G.A.`
`For Respondent`	`2` `:-`	`Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate`

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶14

Order on Board

¶15

13/12/2021

¶16

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner's joining is not being accepted by respondent No. 4, therefore, appropriate direction be issued to him.

¶17

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

¶18

3. Be that as it may, petitioner is at liberty to make representation before respondent No. 4 within 10 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, which will be considered by respondent No. 4 within three weeks from the date of filing of the representation strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶19

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s).

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge

¶22

Harneet

Mukesh Nage v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Nage v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bramha Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tanmay Das Gupta and Ors. Vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Pramod Kumar Jangde Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Goutam Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Gautam Prasad Nirala Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Divya Neomy Benjamin Vs State of Chhattisgarh