Disposed

Pramod Kumar Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC10 Dec 2021WPS/2841/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the petitioner sought direction to respondent No.6 for consideration of unpaid salary. The court directed the respondent to decide the representation within 30 days via a reasoned order, explicitly reserving judgment on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.6 to consider and decide petitioner's salary representation within 30 days via reasoned order.

Pramod Kumar Jangde Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (S) No.2841 of 2012

¶5

Pramod Kumar Jangde, S/o. Late Laindas Jangde, aged about
42 years, R/o. Village Piparkhunta, Post-Devarhat, Tahsil-
Lormi, Distt.Bilaspur (Now Mungeli) (CG)

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (CG)

¶9

2. Collector, Bilaspur/Mungeli (CG)

¶10

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Lormi, Distt.Bilaspur/Mungeli (CG)

¶11

4. District Education Officer, Distt.Bilaspur/Mungeli (CG)

¶12

5. Block Education Officer, Janpad Panchayat – Lormi, Distt.Bilaspur/Mungeli (CG)

¶13

6. Head Master, Govt.Primary School, Daukapa, Block/TahsilLormi, Distt.Bilaspur/Mungeli (CG)

¶14

---- Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner: Mr.Topilal Bareth, Advocate
For Respondents/State: Mr.Lalit Jangde, G.A.

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board

¶17

10/12/2021

¶18

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that short grievance raised in this writ petition is that respondent No.6 has not paid salary to the petitioner from July, 2011 to November, 2011 and for which, he has already made a representation, which may be directed to be considered and decided expeditiously.

¶19

2. Be that as it may, respondent No.6 is directed to consider and dispose off of the petitioner's representation for salary from July, 2011 to November, 2011 within a period of 30 days from today by reasoned and speaking order. It

¶20

is made clear that this Court has not expressed any

¶21

opinion on merits of the case.

¶22

3. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the writ
petition finally stands disposed off. NO order as to
cost(s).

¶23

 (Sanjay K.Agrawal)
 Judge

¶24

B/-

Pramod Kumar Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balram Prasad Shukla Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sharda Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

M.L. Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Bramha Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tanmay Das Gupta and Ors. Vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

Ramchandra Tiwari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.