Disposed

Smt. Sweta Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC15 Jan 2021WPCR/32/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was an order on a writ petition where petitioners, a married couple opposing their father's wishes, sought police protection against threats from the father. The court directed them to apply to the Superintendent of Police for consideration and then disposed of the petition without further relief.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to file application before Superintendent of Police; matter disposed after observation.

Smt. Sweta Sharma Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 32 of 2021

¶5

1. Smt. Sweta Sharma D/o Shri Dhaneshwar Sharma, W/o Shri Avatar Manikpuri Aged About 21 Years R/o Ward No. 7, Near Govt. High School Sakari, Distt.- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

2. Avatar Manikpuri S/o Shri Suresh Manikpuri Aged About 29 Years R/o Ward No. 7, Near Govt. High School Sakari, Distt.- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶7

---- Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary Home Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶10

2. Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

3. Station House Officer Police Station Sakari, Distt.- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

4. Station House Officer Police Station Suhela, Distt.- Balodabajar, Chhattisgarh

¶13

5. Dhaneshwar Sharma R/o Ward No. 14 Sildaha Mungeli, Thana And Tahsil- Mungeli, Distt.- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

¶14

---Respondents

¶15

For Petitioners : Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondents 1 to 4/State : Shri Ravi Bhagat, Dy. Govt. Advocate

¶16

Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶17

Order on Board

¶18

15.01.2021.

¶19

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 both are major and married to each other against the wishes of father of petitioner No.1/respondent No.5 herein. The petitioners are apprehending threat to their life by respondent No.5, therefore, they may be provided with appropriate police protection.

¶20

2. Be that it may, if the petitioners move an application before the Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur by tomorrow, which will be considered

¶21

¶22

by the concerned authority within next three days from the date of filing of

¶23

the application, strictly in accordance with law.

¶24

3 . With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶25

Certified copy today.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

Bini

Smt. Sweta Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sweta Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Ghurwa and Anr.

Prabhu Ram Sahu (Died) Through Lrs. Rajesh Sahu Vs Smt Sakuntala Chouhan

Mangalram and Another Vs Shiv Kumar Patel and Others

Safique Ahmed Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Ram Bai Vs Shyam Bai and Another

Durlabh Agrawal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.