Disposed
Safique Ahmed v. the State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh HCCRMP/31/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Misc.…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Misc.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Misc. Petition No.31 of 2021
Safique Ahmed, S/o Inayat Miyan, Aged about 35 years, R/o Village Dudhbal, P.S. Ranka, District Gadwa (Jharkhand) At present Village Sarima, P.S. Shankergarh, District Surguja (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
The State of Chhattisgarh, Through P.S. Shankergarh, District Surguja (C.G.)
---- Respondents
(Office reference)
Single Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
Order On Board
15/01/2021
1. This is an office reference based on the request letter dated 2912-2020 sent by the District & Sessions Judge, Surguja (Ambikapur) for disposal of Criminal Appeal No.501/2003 and the request letter dated 29-12-2020 sent by the 5th Additional District Judge, Ambikapur, for extension of time for final disposal of Criminal Appeal No.501/2003.
2. I have perused the office reference and the request letter.
3. Considering the extraordinary reason shown by the District Judge, Ambikapur, time is extended up to 28-2-2021 to comply the order. The Inspector General of Police, Surguja Range is directed to ensure the presence of the concerned accused in order to enable the learned trial Court to comply the order of this Court.
4. A copy of this order be sent to the District Judge and the Inspector General of Police, Surguja Range for compliance.
5. The office reference is disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
Safique Ahmed
The State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court