Ram Bai v. Shyam Bai and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeared to be a second appeal where the appellant had no instructions. The court dismissed the appeal without hearing.
Appeared to be a second appeal where the appellant had no instructions. The court dismissed the appeal without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No.151 of 2010
Smt. Ram Bai, D/o Late Lala Ram, aged about 50 years, R/o Village Salka, P. S. Khadgawan, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koria (C.G.)---- Appellant
Versus
1. Shyam Bai @ Muthari, W/o Babulal Uraon, aged about 40 years, R/o Village Salka, P. S. Khadgawan, Tahsil Manendragarh, District Koria
2. State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Baikunthpur (Koria), District Koria (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For AppellantMr. Mahendra Dubey, Advocate
For Respondent No.2Mr. R. K. Bhagat, Dy. GA
Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
15/01/2021
1. At the outset, Mr. Mahendra Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant, fairly submits that he has no instructions from the appellant.
2. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed, however, the appellant is at liberty to move a representation, if she so desires, in accordance with law.
Sd/-
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judge
Nirala
Smt. Ram Bai
Shyam Bai @ Muthari
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court