A contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a previous order was disposed of. The court allowed the petitioner to file a writ petition challenging the respondent's recent reasoned order rejecting the petitioner's claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Contempt Case (C) No. 153 of 2021
---- Petitioner
Versus
Shri Prabhakar Pandey, Presently posted as the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (CG)
---Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri Faisal Akhtar, Advocate For Respondent : Shri BD Guru, Advocate
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
16.3.2021.
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner herein, alleging non-compliance of this Court's order dated 21.11.2017 passed in WPC No.3053 of 2017.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has passed a reasoned order by considering the representation of the petitioner afresh in compliance of order of this Court and the same has been filed along with affidavit.
3. In view of the statement of learned counsel for the respondent that a reasoned order has been passed by the respondent whereby the claim of the petitioner has been rejected, the petitioner is at liberty to question the order passed by the respondent, in accordance with law.
4. With aforesaid observation, the contempt case stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
JUDGE
Bini
M/s. Sarkar Construction through its Partner Rajesh Sarkar
Shri Prabhakar Pandey
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
