The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a second appeal for want of prosecution because the appellant was absent when the case was called for hearing in the second round despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No. 328 of 2012
Versus
1. Mu. Temabai Wd/o. Shriram, aged about 51 years, R/o. Village Bodapali, Tahsil Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund (CG)
2. Mu. Lagan Moti Wd/o. Baliram, aged about 49 years, R/o. Village Bodapali, Tahsil Saraipali, Distt. Mahasamund (CG)
3. Tikaslal S/o. Meghnath, aged about 61 years, R/o. Village Risekela, Tahsil Saraipali, distt. Mahasamund (CG)
4. State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Mahasamund (CG)
---Respondents
For Appellant : None present For Respondents : Not noticed
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
15.3.2021.
1. None present for the appellant even when the case is called for hearing in the second round.
2. In this circumstance, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Bini
Narhari Patel
Mu. Temabai
Mu. Lagan Moti
Tikaslal
State of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Mahasamund
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
