Allowed

Karan Soni @ Rohit v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Nov 2020MCRC/5942/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of two separate bail applications under MCRC Nos. 5942 and 7127 of 2020 arising from a robbery case. Despite the case being triable by a JMFC and a charge sheet filed, the court allowed bail for a jail term exceeding three months.

What did the court decide?

Applicants allowed bail upon execution of a personal bond for Rs.50,000/- with one surety for the same amount and appearing on all said dates of the trial Court.

Karan Soni @ Rohit Vs the State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 5942 of 2020

¶5

Karan Soni @ Rohit S/o Suresh Soni Aged About 20 Years R/o Behind F.C.I. Godown, Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station, Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicant

¶8

MCRC No. 7127 of 2020

¶9

Naveen Kashyap @ Phulki S/o Vinod Kashyap Aged About 19 Years R/o Bus Stand Manendragarh District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Manendragarh , District Koriya Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-Applicant

¶12

For Applicant : Shri Hemant Agrawal and Shri Akhtar Hussain, Adv. For Non-Applicant : Shri Vikram Sharma, Deputy GA.

¶13

Proceeding Through Video Conferencing

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶15

Order On Board

¶16

04/11/2020 :

¶17

1. The aforesaid MCRCs are being disposed of by this common order as

¶18

they arise out of Crime No.222/2020, registered in Police Station Manendragarh, District Korea, for offence under Section 394/34 of the IPC.

¶19

¶20

2. The present applicants along with third accused Sahil Kesharwani looted Rs.10,000/- cash and 2 mobile sets and also assaulted the victim Rajaram at about 11 am on 1.7.2020.

¶21

3. Learned State Counsel would oppose the prayer for grant of bail. However, he would submit that the concerned SHO has not reported any previous criminal antecedents of the applicants.

¶22

4. Considering that the applicants are in jail since 2.7.2020 i.e. for more than 3 months; offence is triable by the JMFC and charge sheet has already been filed, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail.

¶23

5. Accordingly, the applications are allowed and the applicants are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. They are directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

¶24

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)

¶25

Barve

Karan Soni @ Rohit v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Soni @ Rohit v. the State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Roshan Lal Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nirakar @ Salom @ Virat @ Paster Tandi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bajrang and Another Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sandeep Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ritik Sharma @ Lalla and Another Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Inder Pal Khurana Vs State of Chhattisgarh