The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a bail application filed by an accused arrested for offences under IPC Section 363, 366, 376 and POCSO. The court held that withing the combined age of the prosecutrix (less than sixteen years), the applicant is not inclined to release on bail.
Application for bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5017 of 2020
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Shri AK Yadav, Advocate. For Non-Applicant : Shri Dinesh Tiwari, Deputy GA.
Proceeding Through Video Conferencing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
03/11/2020 :
2
Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Barve
2 issues framed by the court
Whether theapplicant should be released on bail in a case involving sexual offence against a child below the age of sixteen.
Whether the nature of allegations and the age of the prosecutrix warrants granting bail to the accused.
5 provisions across 1 enactments
Nirakar @ Salom @ Virat @ Paster Tandi
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
