Allowed

Bajrang and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC3 Nov 2020MCRC/4535/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed a first bail application filed by Bajrang and Dhani, arrested for murder (IPC 302) and other offences. The court granted regular bail considering the quality of evidence regarding the applicants' identity. They were directed to execute a personal bond with one surety.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed; applicants directed to be released on personal bond of Rs.50,000/- each with one surety.

Bajrang and Another Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 4535 of 2020

¶4

Bajrang S/o Bhgvat Aged About 27 Years Caste - Panika

¶5

Dhani S/o Kaleshwar Aged About 22 Years

¶6

Both are R/o Village Dharampur, Police Station Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

¶7

---- Applicants

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh.

¶10

---- Respondent

¶11

For Applicants Mr. Arun Shukla, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Alok Bakshi, Addl. Adv. General

¶12

(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)

¶13

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

3/11/2020

¶16

Heard.

¶17

The applicants have preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of CrPC, as they are arrested in connection with Crime No.92/2020, registered at Police Station Rajpur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (CG), for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 294, 506 Part II read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

At about 1.00 am in the intervening night of 26^th & 27^th May, 2020 the deceased Puran Gond was assaulted by his brotherin-law Motu, Motu's uncle (not named) and two other persons. In the eyewitness account informed to the police by witness Devdas he has only named Motu and not the remaining three accused persons. Similarly, in the oral dying declaration of deceased Puran Chand made before witness Devdas he has also named Motu & Motu's uncle without naming him or the remaining two accused.

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the State, per contra, would oppose the bail application.

¶20

Considering the quality of evidence relating to identity of the applicants in commission of crime, I am of the opinion that present is a fit case to release the applicants on regular bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and the applicants are directed to be released on bail on each of them executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. They are directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

¶22

Certified copy as per rules.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge

¶25

Gowri

Bajrang and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajrang and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lilesh Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Yushuf Ansari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Roshan Lal Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Nirakar @ Salom @ Virat @ Paster Tandi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kumari Rajmati Ekka Vs State of Chhattisgarh