High Court dismissed the writ petition under Order XL Rule 1 of CPC for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or make representation despite the second call in July 2019.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 928 of 2013
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
| 04/07/2019 | None for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A. for the State. | |
| Even in the second call, none appears nor any | |
| representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, | |
| the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for |
| want of prosecution. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Accordingly, this prosecution. |
petition is dismissed for want of | |
| Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
||
| Jyoti |
Snatak Mahavidyalaya Shikshan Samiti Through The Chairman
Ram Narayan Shukla
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Deptt Of Higher Education
State Of C.G. Through The Secretary, Deptt Of Commerce And Industries
Dr. J.P. Shivhare
Dr. S.R. Kamlesh
Goutam Bhaduri
Jyoti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
