This order dismisses the petitioner's writ petition for want of prosecution, as no representatives appeared before the court on either call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 5736 of 2011
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| 04/07/2019 | None for the Petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Shri Shreyankar Nandy, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Anup Majumdar, Counsel for Respondent No.2. Ms. Astha Shukla, P.L. for the State. |
|
| Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. |
|
| Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|
| Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Municipal Corporation Bhilai
Jitendra Kumar Gupta
The Distt. Magistrate Durg
Govind Singh Rajput
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
