Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners and their counsel failed to appear at the second hearing to present their case.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WPC No. 6134 of 2007
All R/o. Village Parsada, Post-Patrapali, Tahsil & District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
….... Petitioners
…....Respondents 07.01.2019 None for the Petitioners. Mr. Manish Nigam, Panel Lawyer for the State. Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Ashok Judge
Chandu Lal Patel
Bharat Lal Patel
Hriday Lal Patel
Dolnarayan Patel
State of Chhattisgarh
Collector/ Incharge Land Acquisition Officer, Raigarh
Ashok
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
