Dismissed
Smt. Chandra Bai v. Sarwajaik Shitla Hanuman Mandir Samiti
Chhattisgarh HCMA/22/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants.
What the court decided
AI extract
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
MA No. 22 of 2017
No.2 to 5 are minor, through natural guardian mother Chandai Bai Wd/o Kishori Lal Sahu, R/o Village Khapra Bhatthi, Bajrang Nagar, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh,
Versus
----Respondents
| 04/01/2019 | None for the appellants. |
|---|---|
| Shri Sameer Behar, PL for the State. | |
| Shri K.K. Dewangan, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Pradeep Singh Rathore, counsel for respondents No.1 to 4. |
|
| Smt. Prabha Sharma, counsel for respondent No.6. | |
| The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation |
on behalf of the appellants.
No one appears for the appellants even in the second call. In the circumstances, there is no other option left with the court but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE
gouri
Chanda Bai Wd/o Late Kishori Lal Sahu
Sarwajanik Shitla Hanuman Mandir Samiti
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court