Civil appeal in FA No. 290 of 2018 dismissed for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite repeated calls.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA No. 290 of 2018
Yogeshwar S/o Bimbadhar Aged About 64 Years R/o Village Tumidih, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh (Defendant No.1), --- Appellant
Versus
| 04.01.2019 | No one appears for the appellant when the matter is called out even in second round. Mr. Samir Behar, P.L., for the State. Since no one appears to argue the case on behalf of the appellant despite repeated call, this Court is left with no other way except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- |
|---|---|
| GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE |
R a o
Yogeshwar S/o Bimbadhar
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
