Appearing under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the applicant sought bail challanging conviction under the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The High Court refused relief stating there was no change of circumstances to justify enlarging the applicant on bail in a second application after the first was rejected.
None.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 2908 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
----Non Applicant For the Applicant : Mr. Ashish Surana, Advocate with Mr. Ankit Borker, Advocate
For Non Applicant : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
07.05.2019
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Parul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the second bail application given that the earlier application was rejected without change of circumstances.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ankaj Kumar Singh
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
