The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the first bail application of the accused, who was accused of repeatedly having sexual intercourse with a victim under 16 years of age, citing the seriousness of the offence and its impact on society.
Bail application rejected; the applicant was not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1249 of 2019
Manoj Kumar S/o Nandlal @ Jhinga Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Sakreli, Police Station Baradwar District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Baradwar District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh .
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri Yogeshwar Sharma, Advocate For the State : Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
07/05/2019
2
further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be granted bail under Section 439 CrPC in a case involving sexual penetration of a child below 16 years.
Whether the presence of any antecedents affects the bail decision in serious child sexual offence cases.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manoj Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
