Allowed

Yashkumar Chandrawanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 May 2019MCRC/2104/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to the applicant accused of forcible sexual intercourse with a minor under POCSO, IPC Sections 452, 376, and 506. The prosecution and informant-petition supported release, and the court found no likelihood of absconding.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond in Rs. 25,000 and one solvent surety of the same amount.

Yashkumar Chandrawanshi Vs State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 2104 of 2019

¶5

Yashkumar Chandrawanshi S/o Baldou Chandrawanshi Aged About 19 Years R/o Ward No. 3, Pandatarai, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police StationPandatarai, Disrtict- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh .

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For the Applicant : Shri SRJ Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

07/05/2019

¶14

Allegedly informant-prosecutrix is present.

¶15

After putting some questions this Court satisfied that the person who is present in the Court is informant-prosecutrix.

¶16

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶17

Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.33/2019 registered at Police Station Pandatarai, District Kabirdham (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 452, 376, 506 of IPC and Section 3, 4 of POCSO Act.

¶18

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that on 28/02/2019 prosecutrix was below 16 years of age. She is resident of village Nayapara. On 28/02/2019 applicant entered in her house, gave threats to kill her and committed forcible sexual intercourse with her.

¶19

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

¶20

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

¶21

Informant-prosecutrix submitted that applicant may be released on bail.

¶22

As per true copy of the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC, applicant had come in her house to give the question paper, she had signed on Police report without reading it. Now she does not want any action against him.

¶23

Looking to the above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper the evidence, it is directed that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with a personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court with the condition that

¶24

¶25

he shall appear before the trial Court at 11.00 am as and when directed till trial and he would cooperate during the trial, he shall be released on bail.

¶26

Certified copy as per rules.

¶27

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶28

Kamde

Yashkumar Chandrawanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yashkumar Chandrawanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Kumar Baiga Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Topchand Gupta @ Anjan Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Patiya Devi & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manoj Kumar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ankaj Kumar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mohammad Taiyyab Vs State of Chhattisgarh