This single-appended judgment held that an appeal filed by an appellant against a judgment decree passed in his favor was misconceived in law. Consequently, both the appeal and the petition for approval of forma pauperis were dismissed.
The appeal and the MCC petition for formapaoeris permission were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 905 of 2018
Versus
--- Respondents
| For Applicant | : Mr. Arjeet Tiwari, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent No.1 | : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate. |
| For State/Respondent No.2 | : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Advocate. |
DB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order On Board
19/11/2019
| Sd/- | Sd/- |
|---|---|
| (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge |
(Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge |
Ravi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal filed against a judgment favoring the appellant is maintainable when it is based only on certain findings.
Whether a formapaoeris petition should remain pending when the substantive appeal is misconceived.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narayan Prasad Dewangan
Nishant Ahmed Junjani
Collector Bilaspur
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
