The Division Bench dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on multiple listing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FAM No. 76 of 2019
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellant : None For Respondent : Shri Aman Yadav, Advocate
D.B.:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order On Board
18/11/2019
This case was earlier listed on 15/10/2019, but none appeared for the appellant and the case was adjourned. It was again listed on 11/11/2019. Again, nobody appeared for the appellant and adjournment was again granted.
Today also, the case was called twice but there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
Obviously, the appellant does not appear to be interested in prosecuting the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) ( Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge Judge
Deepti
Debojeet Guha
Smt. Soma Guha
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
