During the pendency of the appeal seeking a divorce judgment, both parties applied for divorce by mutual consent which is pending. The Bench was not inclined to proceed further and dismissed the appeal with liberty to revive.
Appeal dismissed with liberty to the appellant to revive the matter if occasion arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FAM No. 92 of 2019
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellant : Shri Rajeev Bharat, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Amit Kumar, Advocate
D.B.:- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order On Board
18/11/2019
Learned counsel for the parties submit that during the pendency of this appeal, both the parties have applied for grant of divorce by mutual consent which is pending.
In view of above, we are not inclined to proceed further in the matter. This appeal is according dismissed, however, with liberty to the appellant to revive, if occasion arises.
Sd/Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) ( Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge Judge
Deepti
Rajshri Purseth W/o Virendra Kumar Sahu
Virendra Kumar Sahu S/o Sudama Prasad Sahu
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
