A division bench allowed an application for withdrawal of a miscellaneous appeal. The substantive appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Application for withdrawal allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MA No. 92 of 2019
Versus
For Appellant : Shri Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate
D.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor
Order on Board
Per Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
15/11/2019
Heard on I.A. No. 01/2019, for withdrawal of Misc. Appeal.
Upon due consideration the application is allowed.
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ) (Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge Judge
Pawan
M/s Gagan Fuels Through its Proprietor - Madan Lal Tandon
R. K. Singh
Anup Kumar Verma
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Vimla Singh Kapoor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
