This order dismisses a Public Interest Litigation petition as not pressed in the changed circumstances. The petitioners voluntarily withdrew the case without opposing it. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 126 of 2017
Abhishek Makhija Aged About 27 Years R/o Sector-3, Shivanada Shri Nagar, Gudhiyari, Raipur 492001, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Ms. Meha Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate. For Respondent/Corporation : Shri H. B.Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Deepali Dubey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
27/09/2018
1. In the changed circumstances, learned counsel for the Petitioner does not press this public interest litigation petition.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondents have no objection.
3. In view of above, this writ application is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/Sd/(Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Amit
Abhishek Makhija
The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary
The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department
Municipal Corporation Raipur
Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
