Judgment disposed off without deciding substantive issues. The court held that the issues raised in the PIL could be resolved administratively by the High Court in coordination with State authorities under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPPIL No. 25 of 2018 M/s Laxloft Legal Advisory LLP, Registered Office at Gole Bazar, Near City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 495001. Through Their Managing Partners :
---- Petitioners
Versus
For Petitioners : In person. For State : Shri Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General.
---- Respondents
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 26.09.2018
Sd /- Sd /- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
Jamal
M/s Laxloft Legal Advisory LLP & Others
Union Of India
State Of Chhattisgarh
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
