Disposed

Shankar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC3 Jul 2018WPC/849/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed by Shankar Patel regarding encroachment by respondents, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, permitted the petitioner to make a representation to the Collector, District Durg, for redressal of grievance. The petition was disposed of on these terms.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to make representation to the Collector, District Durg, for redressal of grievance.

Shankar Patel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 849 of 2013

¶5

Shankar Patel S/o Lt Shri Bhagela Patel Aged About 35 Years R/o Bhilai-3, PS Bhilai-3, Tah Patan, Civil And Revenue Distt Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Deptt Of Urban Administration Development, Mantralaya, New Raipur, PS Rakhi, Civil And Revenue Distt Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

The Collector Durg, PS Durg, Civil And Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶10

Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Palika Parishad Bhilai Charoda, PS Bhilai, Civil And Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶11

Manik Dey S/o Suresh Dey President Mashal Club Bengali Society, Durgotsav Samiti, R/o Indira Para, Police Quarter Road, Bhilai-3, PS Bhilai, Civil And Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶12

Sanjay Thakur S/o Bisahu Thakur Councillor, Nagar Palika Parishad Bhilai Charoda, PS Bhilai, Civil And Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶13

Sita Sahu W/o Premlal Sahu President, Nagar Palika Parishad Bhilai Charoda, PS Bhilai, Civil And Revenue Distt Durg, R/o Vill Ganiyari, Tah Patan, PS Patan, Civil And Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶14

Rajaram Tripathi Priest, R/o Kali Mandir, Near Mini Stadium, G.E.Road, Bhilai-3, PS Bhilai, Civil And Revenue District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

¶15

--- Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner : Ms. Sangeeta Kashyap, Advocate. For Respondents No. 3,5 & 6 : Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General. For Respondents / State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. G. A.

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶18

Order On Board

¶19

03/07/18

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Collector, District Durg be directed to take appropriate action against the encroachers / respondents herein.

¶21

¶22

Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to make representation before the Collector, District Durg for redressal of his grievance who, in turn, shall consider and dispose of petitioner's representation after hearing the affected parties strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

¶24

SD/-

¶25

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶26

Priyanka

Shankar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maa Madawa Rani Primary Mahila Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Puja Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Rakesh Mittal Vs Cg.State Information and Ors.

Bitawan Bai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Sanyogita Barlo Vs State Of C.g. and Ors.

Khelan Das Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.