Petitioner filed a writ petition regarding Right to Information. The High Court held that the petition had become infructuous as the second appeal had already been decided, and the writ petition was disposed of without detailed reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1390 of 2013
Smt. Puja Sharma, W/o Gopal Sharma, aged about 28 years, R/o Ratakhar, Atal Awas, Qr. No.49, Tahsil – Korba, Police Station Balco Nagar, Tahsil – Korba, Civil & Revenue District – Korba (Chhattisgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri C.P. Lahery, Advocate. For State : Shri Ratan Pusty, Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Shri Shyam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
02/07/2018
(1) Counsel for respondent No. 2 would submit that the petitioner's second appeal has already been decided, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
2
Smt. Puja Sharma
State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh State Information Commission
The Deputy Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Information Commission
The First Public Information Appellate Authority
The Public Information Officer
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
