The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being called in the second round of hearings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No. 1906 of 2012
Sanyogita Barlo, D/o Setam Singh Barlo, aged about 53 years, P.O. & P.S. - Mahasaund, R/o Mahasamund, Tahsil & District Mahasamund (C.G.)
----Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents.
For Petitioner : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
03/07/2018
(1) Even after the mater was called out for hearing in the second round, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, in these circumstances, this court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
2
Sanyogita Barlo
State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe Development Department
The Collector, Mahasamund
The Sub Divisional Officer, Mahasamund
The Tahsildar, Mahasamund
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
