Petitioners sought to withdraw a writ application due to a subsequent order by the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission. The High Court disposed of the application allowing the withdrawal.
Withdrawal of the writ application allowed with liberty to approach the forum
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2218 of 2015
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/UOI : Shri B.Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General. For Respondent No.2 : Shri Malay Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board
12/10/2018
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
1. In view of the subsequent development including an order passed on 21.06.2016 by the Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission, counsel for the Petitioners prays to withdraw the writ application with liberty that if any adverse decision is subsequently taken, they may approach the forum so advised.
2. The writ application stands disposed off in view of the above.
Sd/Sd/(Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Anu
Jindal Steel And Power Ltd.
Kamal Agrawal
Union Of India
Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
