Single Judge held that election process cannot be interfered with once begun and internal remedy is available. Writ Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Appeal No. 739 of 2018
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Appellant | : Shri Roop Naik, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent No.1/State | : Shri Prasun Bhaduri, Government Advocate. |
| For Respondent No.2 | : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate. |
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Judgment on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
12.10.2018
2
Sd/Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge
Brijmohan
Devanand Chandra
State of Chhattisgarh
State Cooperative Election Commission
The Returning Officer, Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit, Kedar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
