B.L.Gangber v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Review Petition No.…
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Review Petition No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Review Petition No. 90 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri B.P. Rao, Advocate. For Respondent/UOI : Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General.
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board
Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice
22.10.2018
2
Pension, Government of India which has been annexed as Annexure-R-A/2. Reliance has been placed by the counsel on the said OM, especially para 7(k) where some kind of time frame has been indicated to complete the departmental proceedings and in case of delay, the OM talks of desirability of giving promotion on ad-hoc basis.
| Sd/- | Sd/- |
|---|---|
| (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) |
(Parth Prateem Sahu) |
| Chief Justice | Judge |
Brijmohan
B.L. Gangber
Union of India
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court