The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition filed by Yes Bank Limited as infructuous, finding no substantive issue requiring adjudication in paragraph 17.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP(C) No.7531 of 2009
Yes Bank Limited a Banking Company Incorporated in India and having its registered office at 9th Floor Nehru Centre, Discovery of India Building Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli Mumbai 400018 through its Authorized Officer Shri Piyush Arora, Son of Shri Mahendra Kumar Arora, aged about 32 years, Branch Manager, Yes Bank Raipur (CG).
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate For State/Resp.No.1: Mr. Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General For Resp.No.2 & 3 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate For Resp. No.4 : Mr. Vivek Chopda, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
22/11/2017
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous.
(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
L/-
Yes Bank Limited
State of Chhattisgarh
The Municipal Corporation, Raipur
Smt. Jagdish Kaur
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
