Disposed

Avaneesh Agarwal v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC22 Nov 2017WPC/4024/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a writ petition. While the petitioner was advised to file a fresh representation regarding road width reduction, an existing interim order was maintained for a short period during consideration. Liberty was reserved for future challenges.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file a fresh representation; existing interim order maintained for two months.

Avaneesh Agarwal Vs State of Chhattisgarh… — Municipal and Town Planning | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No.4024 of 2009

¶4

Avaneesh Agrawal, son of Shri Ramnivas Agrawal, aged about 26 years, resident of G-40, Dunga Ji Colony, Raipur

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Ministry of Town & Country Planning Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur

¶8

2. The Municipal Corporation, Raipur through its Commissioner, Malviya Road, Raipur (CG)

¶9

3. The Director, Town & Country Planning, Directorate, Chhattisgarh, Collectorate, Raipur

¶10

---- Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner	: Mr.B.P.Sharma, Advocate
For Respondents No.1&3	: Mr.Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.
For Respondent No.2	: Mr.Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate

¶12

Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶13

Order on Board

¶14

22/11/2017

¶15

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be allowed to make a representation for reducing width of the road from Aamapara Chowk to railway crossing near M.P.S.R.T.C. Depot and respondent No.3/Director, Town & Country Planning, Directorate, Raipur be directed to dispose of the same within the specified period, for which representation has already been made by public representative.

¶16

2. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh representation before respondent No.3/Director, Town & Country Planning, Directorate, Raipur within two weeks from

¶17

2 today and that will be considered within two months from the date of receipt of the representation by respondent No.3/Director, Town & Country Planning, Directorate, Raipur after hearing the petitioner. Since interim order is already operating in favour of the petitioner since 28.7.2010, same shall remain in operative for the aforesaid period of two months and two weeks.

¶18

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court if any adverse order is passed by respondent No.3. No cost(s).

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶21

B/-

Avaneesh Agarwal v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avaneesh Agarwal v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh Vs M/S Chhattisgarh Distilleries Ltd.

Rajeev Grih Nir.Sah.Sam.Mary.Raipur Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Ram Lal Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Jagdish Kaur Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Another

Yes Bank Limited Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Leela Ram Gautam Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.