Disposed

Leela Ram Gautam v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC22 Nov 2017WP/3460/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner to make a representation to the State Government regarding his denied promotion and consequential service benefits, directing the government to decide within two months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed to make representation for redressal of grievances and consequential benefits to be decided by State Government within two months.

Leela Ram Gautam Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors. — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No.3460 of 2003

¶5

Leela Ram Gautam, S/o late S.L. Gautam, aged 52 years, R/o Deputy Director Agriculture, Rajnandgaon, Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of C.G., through the Chief Secretary, Agriculture Department, Secretariat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)

¶9

Special Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

Director, Agriculture Department, Directorate, Behind Collectorate, Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

Kapoor Chand Paikara, Regional Director, Beej Pramanikaran Sanstha, Raipur (C.G.)

¶12

Ganesh Kumar Nirmam, Regional Director, Krishi Jalwayu, Kshetriya Pariyojana, Jagdalpur (C.G.)

¶13

Shanti Ram Ratre, Regional Director, Krishi Jalwayu, Kshetriya Pariyojana, Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

---- Respondents

¶15

For Petitioner: Mr. M.L. Sen, Advocate. For Respondents No.1 to 3 / State: -

¶16

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer.

¶17

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶18

Order On Board

¶19

22/11/2017

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been illegally and arbitrarily denied promotion on the post of Joint Director, but later-on, he was promoted and therefore he may be allowed to make representation to the State Government claiming all consequential service benefits.

¶21

Learned State counsel opposes the submission.

¶22

¶23

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed to make representation before the State Government for redressal of his grievances / consequential service benefits, if any. If the petitioner makes representation within two weeks from today, the State Government will decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously within a period of two months from the date of its receipt, after hearing the petitioner.

¶24

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

¶25

Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶26

Soma

Leela Ram Gautam v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Leela Ram Gautam v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh Vs M/S Chhattisgarh Distilleries Ltd.

Rajeev Grih Nir.Sah.Sam.Mary.Raipur Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Ram Lal Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Jagdish Kaur Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Another

Avaneesh Agarwal Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Yes Bank Limited Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.