A writ petition was dismissed due to lack of instructions from the counsel appearing for the petitioners before the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur.
None granted; petition dismissed due to lack of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition(C) No.6729 of 2008
---- Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioners :Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
2
23/11/2017
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that he has no instructions in the matter and, as such, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
L/-
Prem Singh
T.Venangamudi
R.K. Agrawal
A.K. Bhadra
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Chairman, Board of HSL
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
