The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of domestic enquiry and subsequent termination of the petitioner from services. The court held the findings of misconduct based on evidence were not perverse or illegal and upheld the lower courts' decision.
No order as to cost(s).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition No.3700 of 2003
Hariram Jha, S/o Shri Keshav Jha, Ex-Conductor, R/o Ravishankar Shukla Nagar, Amma Naka, Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, Raipur, Through its Managing Director.
---- Respondent
For Petitioner: Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate. For Respondent: Mr. Tanuj Patwardhan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Pradeep Saksena, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
09/08/2017
2
opposes the submission and supports the impugned orders.
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of domestic enquiry finding the petitioner guilty of misconduct and termination justified pursuant statements of facts by the respondent company is perverse deserving to be set aside
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hariram Jha
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
