Disposed

Smt. Maan Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC8 Aug 2017WPC/753/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court order directed petitioners to file a civil suit with an application for temporary injunction within three weeks, ensuring the trial court decides the matter independently. The writ petition was consequently finally disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioners to file a civil suit with an application for temporary injunction within three weeks; writ petition disposed of.

Smt. Maan Bai Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 753 of 2017

¶5

Smt. Maan Bai W/o Late Shri Brijdas Ratre, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village & Post Bhatgaon, Post Mana Basti, Thana Mujgahan, Civil District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶6

Jeet Kumar Ratre, S/o Shri Atma Ram Ratre, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village & Post Bhatgaon, Post Mana Basti, Thana Mujgahan, Civil District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶7

---- Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Civil & Revenue District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶10

Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶11

Tahsildar Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶12

Gram Panchayat Bhatgaon, Through Its Secretary Gram Panchayat Bhatgaon, Block Dharsiwan, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶13

Shri Mahesh Das Dehariya, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Bhatgaon, Block Dharsiwan, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶14

---- Respondents

¶15

For Petitioners : Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For State : Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate. For respondent No. 5 : Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate.

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶17

Order On Board

¶18

08/08/2017

¶19

(1) Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners may be permitted to file civil suit along with application for temporary injunction before the jurisdictional Civil Court for redressal of their grievances.

¶20

(2) Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to file civil suit along with the

¶21

application for temporary injunction, if any, before the trial Court wihin a period

¶22

¶23

of three weeks from today and in turn the trial Court would consider and decide the same on its own merit in accordance with law without being influenced by interim protection granted by this Court on 28.3.2017 or any other order passed by this Court.

¶24

(3) Since the interim order is operating since 28^th March, 2017, the same would be operative for a period of three weeks from today.

¶25

(4) With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶28

D/-

Smt. Maan Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Maan Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rajwanti Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

M/s Gulab Chand Jain Vs The Municipal Corporation Raipur

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Maha Miritunjya Mahila Machwa Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Vs The Commissioner Bilaspur

Bhilai Nursing Home Vs Presiding Officer and Ors.

Vinod Kumar Singh Vs Phoolsai