Allowed

Rajendra @ Yajendra Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Nov 2017MCRC/3559/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a theft case. Due to his lack of criminal antecedents and recovery of the stolen motorcycle, the court allowed the bail on a personal bond. The court expressed no view on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with one surety.

Rajendra @ Yajendra Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 3559 of 2017

¶4

(Arising out of judgment/order dated ......... in Case No. ...... of the learned......)

¶5

Rajendra @ Yajendra Sahu S/o Khilawan Sahu, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village- Bodra, Tahsil And Police Station- Magarlod, District- Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Applicant (In jail)

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Magarlod, Tahsil- Magarlod, District- Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Non-applicant

¶10

For Applicant : Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent : Shri N.K. Mehta, Panel Lawyer.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

13/11/2017

¶14

Heard.

¶15

The applicant has preferred this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No.23/2017 registered at Police Station Magarlod, District Dhamtari (CG) for the offences punishable under Sections 457 & 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that after breaking the house at night the applicant entered the house of the complainant and committed theft of motorcycle.

¶17

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has not committed any offence. He has falsely been implicated. He is in custody

¶18

since 1.2.2017. The charge sheet has been filed and the conclusion of trial is likely to take some time. The applicant has no criminal past. The motorcycle of the complainant has already been handed over to him by the Court. In these circumstances, he prays that the applicant be enlarged on bail.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application

¶20

Taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 1.2.2017, this Court is of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned.

¶21

Certified copy as per rules.

¶22

Sd/(Pritinker Diwaker) Judge

¶23

roshan/-

Rajendra @ Yajendra Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra @ Yajendra Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dhaal Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Sanjeev Kumar Dey Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Khilawan Bharti @ Bhaira Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Upendra Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Birbal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh