Allowed

Khilawan Bharti @ Bhaira v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Nov 2017MCRC/3619/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to the applicant accused of POCSO, IPC Sections 363, 366, and 376, directing him to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety to the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Released on regular bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like amount.

Khilawan Bharti @ Bhaira Vs State Of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

MCRC No. 3619 of 2017

¶4

Khilawan Bharti @ Bhaira S/o Late Kamandas Bharti, Aged About 22 Years R/o Tarenga, Police Station Bhatapara Gramin, District Baloda Bazar, Chhattisgarh.

¶5

---- Applicant (In Jail)

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O. Police Station Simga, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For Applicant : Shri B.L. Deembra, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Ravindra Agrawal, Panel Lawyer.

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker

¶11

Order On Board

¶12

13/11/2017

¶13

Heard.

¶14

The applicant has preferred this application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is in custody in connection with Crime No.31/16 registered at Police Station Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara (CG) for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

¶15

According to the prosecution, the allegation against the applicant is that he eloped the prosecutrix on the false pretext of marrying her and committed sexual intercourse with her on number of occasions. Further, at the time of incident, the prosecutrix was below 18 years of age.

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent

¶17

and has been falsely implicated in the crime. He further submits that the applicant had performed marriage with the prosecutrix at Dongergarh temple and both were living as husband and wife. He also submits that there is no conclusive evidence regarding the age of the prosecutrix but for the school admission register wherein the age of the prosecutrix has been recorded on the basis of assumption and even in the Court this fact has been admitted by the parents of the prosecutrix. The applicant is still willing to keep the prosecutrix with him. The applicant is in custody since 3.4.2017 and the trial will take time to conclude. Therefore, he prays that the applicant be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶19

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that present is not a case in which applicant should be kept in custody during the whole trial, therefore, without further commenting on the merits of the case, this application is allowed. Applicant Khilawan Bharti alias Bhaira is directed to be released on regular bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned.

¶20

Certified copy as per rules.

¶21

Sd/(Pritinker Diwaker) Judge

¶22

roshan/-

Khilawan Bharti @ Bhaira v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khilawan Bharti @ Bhaira v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dhaal Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Sanjeev Kumar Dey Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Upendra Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Birbal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Keshav Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh