Ideal for an RTI petition where the State counsel undertook to supply claimed information within ten days. The High Court disposed of the writ petition on the strength of this submission without further adjudication.
No specific relief granted; the writ petition was disposed of accepting the undertaking to provide information.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No.2965 of 2017
Sanjay Kumar Pandey, S/o Late Shri Ved Prakash Pandey, age 47 years, R/o Kamla Kunj, Opposite Ramkali Bada, Kargil Chowk, Kasturba Nagar, Sindhi Colony, Police Station Civil Lines, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), Mobile No.94255-39566, E-mail [email protected]
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner: Petitioner in person. For State/Respondents: Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
08/11/2017
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be granted a fresh timeline to supply information from a future date.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Kumar Pandey
Chhattisgarh State Information Commissioner
First Appellate Officer, Office of the District Education Officer, Bemetara
Public Information Officer, Office of Block Education Officer, Nawagarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
