Vinod Puri v. Arjun
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Board of Revenue's order allowing condonation of delay in filing a revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, holding the delay was bona fide.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition fails and is dismissed.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 64 of 2016
- Vinod Puri S/o Late Anand Puri Goswami, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village And Post Demar, Thana Arjuni, Tahsil Dhamtari, Civil & Revenue District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh)
---- Petitioner
Versus
- Arjun S/o Hirderam Caste Bayamhar,
- Ramratan S/o Kartik Ram Caste Yadav,
- Tulsibai Wd/o Bhukhanram, Caste Dhimer,
- Tileshwer S/o Late Derharam, Caste Lohar,
All Resident of Village Demar, Patwari Halka No. 13, Tahsil Dhamtari, Thana Arjuni, Civil & Revenue District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the Board of Revenue's discretion to condone delay in revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act when the delay was bona fide.
Whether the finding that the delay was reasonably explained precludes interference under Article 226.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod Puri
- respondent
Arjun
- respondent
Ramratan
- respondent
Tulsibai
- respondent
Tileshwer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/64/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court