CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP No. 402 of 2002 …
Writ petition dismissed as having rendered infructuous due to written off loan.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP No. 402 of 2002
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioners Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-Bank Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board
12/1/2016
Mr. Sandeep Prakash, Chief Manager, State Bank of Inida, Industrial Estate Branch, Bhilai is present in person.
Mr. Patankar, learned counsel for the respondent – Bank would submit that during pendency of the writ petition, the loan has been written off, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructous.
Mr. Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to dispute the above statement.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/-
Judge
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
M/s Deepa Industries
State Bank Of India
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
