Disposed

Om Prakash Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC13 Jan 2016WPC/60/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition concerning a pending application for a permanent stage carriage permit. The Court directed the respondent to decide the application and other pending cases on the route within reasonable time without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to decide petitioner's pending stage carriage permit application and other pending applications for the concerned route within reasonable time.

Om Prakash Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 60 of 2016

¶5

Om Prakash Singh S/o Shri Paltu Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o H. No. 85, Harikishan Dafari, Sonamani, Tahsil Khadgava District Koria (Chhattisgarh).

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Transport, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶9

Regional Transport Authority, Ambikapur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh).

¶10

---- Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner : Shri Rahul Mishra, Advocate For Respondents-State : Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶13

Order On Board

¶14

13/01/2016

¶15

Grievance of the petitioner is that he has moved an application before the respondent on 06.10.2015 for grant of permanent stage carriage permit on the route Ghutritola to Fulidhumar via Baikunthpur, Ambikapur, Wadrafnagar with two return trip daily.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the said application expeditiously.

¶17

Learned State counsel would submit that the application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided along with all pending applications for the concerned route, in accordance with law and on its own merits as

¶18

¶19

expeditiously as possible.

¶20

In view of the fact that petitioner's application is pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the petitioner's application and all other applications pending before it for the concerned route, within reasonable time.

¶21

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

JUDGE

¶24

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

¶25

ashu

Om Prakash Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Om Prakash Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Deepa Industries Vs State Bank of India and Ors.

Mukesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ramesh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Reshamlal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Vinod Puri Vs Arjun

Smt. Vimla Devi Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh