Disposed

Rajendra Singh Chhabra v. Regional Transport Authority Sarguja

Chhattisgarh HC11 Feb 2016WPC/391/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition challenging the pendency of a permanent stage carriage permit application. The court directed the Regional Transport Authority to decide the petition and other pending applications for the route within reasonable time, reserving an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Respondent to decide the petitioner's application and all other pending applications for the concerned route within a reasonable time.

Rajendra Singh Chhabra Vs Regional Transport… — Property and Title | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPC No. 391 of 2016

¶4

Rajendra Singh Chhabra S/o Late Shri Santosh Singh Chhabra, Aged About 64 Years Occupation Bus Operator, R/o Namnakala Ring Road Ambikapur, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Regional Transport Authority Sarguja ( Sarguja Division) District Sarguja Place At Ambikapur Chhattisgarh

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner - Mr. Shailendra Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent/State - Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate.

¶10

(Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Order On Board

¶11

11/02/2016

¶12

Heard.

¶13

Grievance of the petitioner is that he has moved an application before the respondent/Regional Transport Authority on 18/08/2015 for grant of permanent stage carriage permit on the route from Ambikapur to Bhagwanpur, via- Jarhi, Bhaismuda, Pratappur, Ghongha and back one return trip daily, which has remained undecided

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition may be disposed off with a direction to respondent to decide the said application expeditiously.

¶15

Learned State counsel would submit that the application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided along with all pending applications for the concerned route, in accordance with law and on its own merits as expeditiously as possible.

¶16

In view of the fact that petitioner's application is pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent to decide the

¶17

petitioner's application and all other applications pending before it for the concerned route, within reasonable time.

¶18

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J U D G E

¶21

Rahul

Rajendra Singh Chhabra v. Regional Transport Authority Sarguja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Singh Chhabra v. Regional Transport Authority Sarguja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwati Lal Jain Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Alka Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Kumar Sahoo Vs State Transport Authority

Rampyari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

M/s Shree Sai Rolling Mill Vs The Commissioner

Deepa Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh