Dismissed

Smt. Alka Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC10 Feb 2016WPC/361/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a writ petition seeking direction to the Regional Transport Authority to decide a pending application for a permanent stage carriage permit expeditiously. The Court directed the authority to decide the application and all pending ones on merits within reasonable time without expressing any opinion on the case.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's application and other pending applications for the concerned route within reasonable time.

Smt. Alka Gupta Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

WPC No. 361 of 2016

¶4

Smt. Alka Gupta W/o Shri G.P. Gupta, Jagdalpur (Chhattisgarh) Through Power Of Attorney G.P. Gutpa, Aged About 50 Years, S/o Shanker Lal Gupta, Presently R/o Pratapganj Ward, Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar (Chhattisgarh)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Transport, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶8

Regional Transport Authority, Jagdalpur Distt. Baster (Chhattisgarh)

¶9

---- Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner - Mr. Santosh Gupta, Advocate For Respondent/State - Mr. Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate.

¶11

(Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Order On Board

¶12

10/02/2016

¶13

Heard.

¶14

Grievance of the petitioner is that he has moved an application before the respondent No.2/Regional Transport Authority on 06/10/2015 for grant of permanent stage carriage permit on the route from Sukma to Raipur via Jagdalpur, Kondagaon, Kanker, Dhamtari and back one single trip daily.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition may be disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the said application expeditiously.

¶16

Learned State counsel would submit that the application of the petitioner shall be considered and decided along with all pending applications for the concerned route, in accordance with law and on its own merits as expeditiously as possible.

¶17

In view of the fact that petitioner's application is pending consideration, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's application and all other applications pending before it for the concerned route, within reasonable time.

¶18

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case.

¶19

Sd/-

¶20

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J U D G E

¶21

Rahul

Smt. Alka Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Alka Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Primary Marketing Co-op Society Ltd. Pali Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Yavendra Tiwari Vs Munendra Kumar

Hariram Vs Arjun

Bhagwati Lal Jain Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Kumar Sahoo Vs State Transport Authority

Rajendra Kumar Sahoo Vs State Transport Authority