Rampyari v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed for failure to disclose facts regarding transfer application and failure to file subsequent order sheets after 30/04/15.
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed for failure to disclose facts regarding transfer application and failure to file subsequent order sheets after 30/04/15.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 177 of 2016
Rampyari D/o Khedu, Aged About 65 Years Caste Ganda, R/o Village Bijatipali, Police Station Saraipali, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh).
---- Petitioner
Versus
| ---- Respondents |
|---|
Shri D.Kushwaha, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri B.Gopakumar, Dy.A.G. for the State. Shri Atul Vishwakarma, In-charge, SDO, Revenue, Saraipali is present in the Court.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
11/02/2016
Learned State counsel, upon instructions, informed that the concerned SDO, who is dealing with the case has been transferred and new incumbent has recently taken over charge who is presently on leave.
It is also informed to the Court that the petitioner moved application for transfer of the case and the Commissioner requisitioned the record on 10/09/15 and the records have also been transferred to the Commissioner on 25/09/15 and unless orders are passed on transfer application, present SDO may not decide the case of the petitioner.
The petitioner has not disclosed the facts regarding he himself having moved application for transfer of the case and also did not file subsequent order sheets after 30/04/15.
This petition has been filed in the month of January, 2016. In view of the aforesaid disclosure, I am not inclined to pass any further order in the matter.
Though this Court was inclined to impose cost, looking to the age of the petitioner and that she is a tribal, it is only to be observed that while filing petition, relevant facts are required to be pleaded and cannot be suppressed.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
Presence of the officer is exempted.
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Deepti
Rampyari D/o Khedu
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Mahasamund
The Sub Divisional Officer ( Revenue ), Saraipali
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court